1235 Table 3 Surface sealing success rate Reagent Concentration Resistance (0–10) Result Innocoat 1080 1% 9 Excellent stability, good penetration depth. 3% 7 Faster drying, but superficial, more brittle. 5% 8 Very good stability, but sometimes uneven. Innocoat 1038 1% 5 Partial retention, but easy to break. 3% 4 Surface crust, but brittle and thin. 5% 3 Poor behavior in drying and humidity. Innocoat 1090 1% 6 Good result in dry terrain. 3% 5 Uncertain behavior, partial cracks. 5% 5 Similar to 3%, no significant improvement. Figure 4 - Comparison of the resistance of Innocoat reagents. Blowing results after 13 days of drying: • Innocoat 1080 (1%): Best resistance; surface remains intact; • Innocoat 1090 (1%): Good results, but poor resistance at 3%; • Innocoat 1038: Medium to poor resistance at all concentrations; • At 3% solution, easier destruction is reported for almost all reagents, which is attributed to the mechanical heterogeneity of the terrain; High humidity test This test involves re-testing the effectiveness of Innocoat 1080 “in the field” with a pile of fayalite, dewatered by a filter press. In this way, uniformity is achieved on the surface and in the volume of the material, as well as a boundary (extremely unfavorable compared to the real conditions of disposal) state of the same. For this test, a pile (~1m3) of filter press dewatered fayalite was prepared, placed in the emergency depot (Fig. 5). The surface of the pile was about 5m2. • Treatment of the defined area 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 3 5 resistance (0-10) Concetration (%) Innocoat 1080 Innocoat 1038 Innocoat 1090
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2