1726 Figure 106: Model cross-section of facies distribution The model was then populated with constant porosity, permeability, and acoustic‑impedance values assigned to each facies. These values were obtained from SLB’s Log interpretation chart book along with our experience working in highly heterogeneous salar environments. The values assigned to each facies are presented in Error! Reference source not found.. These petrophysical properties form the basis for s ubsequent dynamic modeling, whereas the acoustic‑impedance distribution is required for evaluating drilling behavior and mechanical feasibility within the heterogeneous stratigraphy. Table 35: Properties assigned values per facies. The resulting model is intentionally simple but fit for purpose: it preserves the key depth heterogeneity that controls flow and mechanical behavior while remaining computationally tractable for sensitivity tests. This framework provides a controlled environment to evaluate horizontal versus vertical well performance in a heterogeneous clastic–evaporite system and to assess how geologic variability influences drilling feasibility and brine production efficiency. As such, it represents a foundational first step toward addressing the broader technical challenges of drilling and production optimization in salar settings, with additional refinements planned as part of our ongoing work. Facies EffecDve Porosity (%) Permeability (mD) AcousDc Impedance (kPa.s/m) Fractured Halite (water filled) 15 500 9300 Evaporites 2 0.005 9300 Target Sand 25 1000 14500 Fine–Medium ClasIcs 10 1 14500 Volcanics 5 10 20300
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2