1906 mining fatality rates between continents is not attributable solely to geological conditions. Differences in mine design philosophies, regulatory maturity, operational practices, workforce composition, and safety culture play a decisive role. Fatality rates are consistently highest in regions characterised by deep, labour-intensive underground mining combined with weak regulatory oversight. ICMM data indicate that a disproportionate share of mining fatalities occurs in underground operations, despite underground miners representing only a small fraction of the global mining workforce. Consequently, most underground mining fatalities are concentrated in Africa and Asia, while Europe, North America, and Australia have demonstrated that low fatality rates can be achieved through strong geotechnical controls and systematic risk management. 3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRODUCTION AND FATALITY RATE According to the global findings from data market research (Reichl, et al., 2023), there is no simple relationship between underground production quantities and fatality rates across continents. Some regions have very high amounts of produces yet also have very low quantities of fatalities recorded, while some regions have lower amounts of produce but suffer from increased levels of fatality rates. This suggests that the level of risk associated with a fatality is primarily determined by how the mining is conducted (as indicated in Table 3) and not how much has been produced. The fatality rate does not correlate to the volume of production (as demonstrated with global underground production volumes), but instead strongly correlate to the depth, stress regime, level of mechanisation, quality of geotechnical controls, and strength and enforcement of governance and safety standards. The pattern of fatality rates related to the operational level of control has been shown when comparing regionalised mine safety data provided by the ICMM against volume of global production (ICMM, 2024). Table 3 - Safety level regionalised at global underground production (ICMM, 2024) Region Production Fatality rate1 Level Relationship Africa Medium Very high 15 – 25 Depth & stress dominate Asia Very high High 10 - 20 Governance moderates Latin America Medium–high High 8 - 15 Informality amplifies Europe Low Low 2 - 5 Exposure limited North America Medium Low 2 - 4 Control decouples Oceania (Australia) Medium Very low 1 - 3 Mechanisation eliminates exposure 4. GLOBAL SUMMARY OF UNDERGROUND MINING SAFETY STRATEGIES Whether they occur in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Europe, North America or Oceania (Australia), underground mining safety performance is influenced more by management of risk than by a region’s level of production. The highest risk in Africa comes from operating very deep and high-stress mines with high seismicity. Safety in Asia is, therefore, focused on controlling the risks that are unavoidable to the nature of mining operations via extensive use of ground support, continuous seismic monitoring, and critical control management with little advancement. A similarly high-risk region, Asia has the largest number of miners in the world, and its focus is on reducing miner exposure (i.e. closing unsafe mines), improving production methods, enhancing gas and ventilation controls, and implementing national Standards. Latin America, on the other hand, has two realities; world-class industrial mines measured against OECD-related technical controls deliver safety performance that is good, while informal mining is the major risk enhancer and continues to contribute to high rates of mining fatalities despite the presence of regulations. Europe operates from the premise of prevention through design by way of conservative designs using engineering principles, and through strict regulatory enforcement to engineer risk out of mining system at a time when underground mining is on the decline. North America has an established relationship of regular production and safe operations by implementing effective ground control plans, enforcing standards, clean operations and creating a strong safety culture among employees to empower them. Oceania (Australia) provides a strong example of achieving low fatality rates by using a small number of people to do mining, using innovative techniques for monitoring geotechnical stability, and using leadership-driven zero-harm governance. These regions show a trend toward a more effective strategic approach (e.g., from containing risk to reducing
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2