244 Table 1- Distribution of Equipment Units by Class and Contractor Digger Class Truck Class 120 Ton 90 Ton 80 Ton 60 Ton 20 Ton 100 Ton 40 Ton 30 Ton Alpha 4 4 29 30 Bravo 1 1 20 Charlie 2 10 Total 4 1 4 1 2 29 50 10 2.1. Comparison Method As shown in Figure 1, the study applies a structured comparative approach comprising four stages: Source Data, Data Collected, Analysis, and Result. Source data were drawn from three operational entities Contractors Alpha, Bravo, and Charlie and organized into two comparison schemes. Figure 1 - Flow Chart Comparison Methods Figure 1 presents the structured comparison framework used to evaluate productivity, fuel efficiency, fleet matching, and energy–emission performance across FMS and non-FMS operations. Figure 2 complements this framework by illustrating the FMS architecture and dispatch control system that enables real-time data acquisition and optimization, linking the analytical approach with practical digital implementation in mining operations. a b Figure 2 - Fleet Management Systems: (a). Architecture, (b). Dispatch Control
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2