2491 2. CONTEXT AND PROBLEM STATEMENT Global demand for gold and critical minerals is accelerating due to the energy transition, digital infrastructure expansion, and financial market dynamics. As supply chains face increasing scrutiny under ESG standards, traceability, transparency, and regulatory stability have become essential pillars of responsible mineral delivery. However, in several producing countries, illegal mining has evolved into a structural governance challenge that directly affects the reliability and integrity of mineral supply. Peru, one of the world’s top gold producers, illustrates this systemic tension. Over the past two decades, illegal mining has expanded territorially, consolidated economic influence, and integrated into formal value chains. Financial intelligence data indicates that suspicious transactions linked to illegal mining accumulated more than USD 80 billion between 2014 and 2024. At the same time, up to 600,000 livelihoods are connected to small-scale and informal mining activities, generating high levels of regional economic dependence. The problem is no longer limited to environmental damage or isolated criminal operations. Illegal mining increasingly overlaps with formal concessions, pressures legislative processes, exploits quasi-formal registration systems, and blends into gold commercialization channels. More than 50% of informal activity operates within third-party concessions, creating territorial friction and operational uncertainty for formal operators. This situation produces five systemic risks for responsible mineral supply: 1. Traceability erosion due to blending of legal and illegal gold. 2. Regulatory volatility resulting from political pressure and temporary formalization mechanisms. 3. Territorial insecurity affecting concession stability. 4. Financial contamination risks within formal banking and export systems. 5. Reputational exposure under global ESG compliance frameworks. Traditional policy responses have focused primarily on enforcement operations or temporary formalization extensions. However, these approaches have not sufficiently addressed the structural legitimacy consolidation of illegal mining at the territorial level. The core challenge, therefore, is not only controlling illegality, but understanding and managing the governance competition that allows illegal mining to persist and expand. Without a structured mechanism to anticipate territorial legitimacy consolidation, governments and industry actors remain reactive rather than preventive. In the context of “Mining for the Future,” addressing illegal mining requires not only enforcement, but governance innovation capable of restoring institutional authority, strengthening supply chain integrity, and rebuilding trust between industry, state, and society. 3. INDUSTRY CHALLENGE AND SYSTEM-LEVEL ISSUE BEING ADDRESSED The mining industry operates within an increasingly demanding global environment characterized by heightened ESG scrutiny, investor pressure, supply chain transparency requirements, and geopolitical sensitivity. In this context, responsible mineral production is not defined solely by operational efficiency, but by institutional reliability, traceability, and social trust. Illegal mining represents a system-level governance disruption that affects these core pillars. At the operational level, territorial overlap between informal and formal mining activities generates concession instability, security risks, and potential production interruptions. Where informal actors operate within or adjacent to industrial concessions, companies face heightened exposure to conflict escalation,
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2