2594 Figure 2 — The Resiliency and Reciprocity Value Equation: progression from consultation toward collaboration, consensus, consent and partnership 6. LIMA, PERU AND THE CONTINUITY OF DIALOGUE The Lima workshop in 1998 demonstrated that these ideas were not confined to Canada. The gathering was built in the image of dialogue — structured, inclusive, participant-driven. The facilitation was led by Antonio Bernales and Juan Arcos, Peruvian mediators and dialogue practitioners who created the conditions in which seventy-six people from eleven Latin American countries could build a shared vision and strategic objectives in real time. The process did not impose a Northern framework. It allowed the room to construct its own direction. My contribution was to complement that facilitation by introducing the Guiding Principles — sharing a framework that had been built through the same kind of process the room was already experiencing. What gave the principles their moral authority, unlike expert-developed frameworks, was precisely this: they had been built and negotiated by the kinds of people who would have to use them, in exactly the spirit the principles themselves describe. When they were introduced in Lima, they landed because the room was already working in their image. The significance of Lima is therefore not only historical. It was a proof of practice: inclusive, informed, structured dialogue across sectors and jurisdictions. It showed how a sustainability conversation could be made concrete by putting the people who carried the different currencies of value into a process designed to help them work across those differences. The longer Peruvian story matters. The Grupo de Diálogo, Minería y Desarrollo Sostenible has sustained a voluntary multi-stakeholder dialogue in Peru for more than two decades. Its current description presents it as a multi-actor dialogue collective with twenty-five years of operation, promoting intercultural dialogue spaces and agendas around mining and sustainable development. The point is not to claim that the Grupo follows the Canadian principles exactly. It is to recognize the continuity of spirit: a durable commitment to dialogue-based approaches in a country where mining, development and social conflict have long been intertwined.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2