Conference Proceedings - World Mining Congress 2026

943 Rising public scrutiny, combined with water scarcity and increasing regulatory oversight, is forcing companies—particularly in Chile—to move toward non-conventional solutions such as high-density, filtered, and co-disposal approaches. In this regulatory landscape, filtered tailings are advantaged because they inherently: • eliminate large water-saturated impoundments, • reduce the likelihood of catastrophic failures, • simplify emergency response and monitoring, and • enable progressive, low-risk closure. These characteristics closely match the intention and structure of GISTM, explaining why filtered systems are frequently cited as the most aligned technology. 8.2 Water Security and the Financial Value of Water Recovery Water scarcity remains a defining issue for modern mining, especially in copper-dominated regions of Chile and Peru. Water in Tailings (Araya et al.) demonstrates that conventional slurry systems retain the majority of water in the TSF, whereas filtered systems can return a dramatically higher volume of water to the process plant, reducing the need for expensive desalination and long-distance pumping. This is consistent with real-world filtered operations, where low-moisture cakes (10–20%) consistently reduce water loss and improve operational reliability. Financial studies also reinforce this: • (Carneiro & Fourie 2019) shows that while filtered tailings may have higher initial costs, they outperform other options in water-related scenarios, especially when energy prices or water scarcity increase. • highlights that filtered tailings resemble the most robust long-term economic option once closure and water risks are properly valued. In short, water security fundamentally reshapes the economic comparison—and filtered tailings benefit the most. 8.3 Closure Performance and Long-Term Liability Reduction Mine closure is one of the highest-cost, highest-risk aspects of tailings management. Both 05_Carneiro demonstrate that filtered tailings systems reduce closure costs by enabling: • progressive rehabilitation during operations, • stable, compacted landforms, • elimination of large dams and associated monitoring, and • greatly reduced long-term environmental liabilities. Modern filtered-tailings designs incorporate engineered drainage systems, cover strategies, and seepage collection, enabling very low seepage and reducing long-term water treatment needs. Compared with slurry systems, which may require decades of water management and dam monitoring, filtered tailings offer a clear closure advantage that aligns with regulators’ expectations for reducing residual risk. 8.4 Technological Improvement Reducing Historical Barriers Historically, filtered tailings were limited by scale, cost, and reliability. That landscape has changed dramatically. • High-throughput filtration: pressure filters capable of low moisture contents and very high throughput, directly reducing the scalability barrier. • Modular plant design and automation: (Calil Paste 2026) Addressing the Barriers to Filtered Tailings adoption, identifies modularity, automated cycle control, and digital monitoring as major contributors to reducing operational complexity and risk.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2