348 Figure 4 - Comparison of the resistance of Innocoat reagents. Blowing results after 13 days of drying: • Innocoat 1080 (1%): Best resistance; surface remains intact; • Innocoat 1090 (1%): Good results, but poor resistance at 3%; • Innocoat 1038: Medium to poor resistance at all concentrations; • At 3% solution, easier destruction is reported for almost all reagents, which is attributed to the mechanical heterogeneity of the terrain; High humidity test This test involves re-testing the effectiveness of Innocoat 1080 “in the field” with a pile of fayalite, dewatered by a filter press. In this way, uniformity is achieved on the surface and in the volume of the material, as well as a boundary (extremely unfavorable compared to the real conditions of disposal) state of the same. For this test, a pile (~1m3) of filter press dewatered fayalite was prepared, placed in the emergency depot (Fig. 5). The surface of the pile was about 5m2. • Treatment of the defined area The pile was treated with the following parameters: Reagent: Innocoat 1080. Concentration: 5 wt. %. Consumption: 2,5 L/m2. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 3 5 resistance (0-10) Concetration (%) Innocoat 1080 Innocoat 1038 Innocoat 1090
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2