218 do not determine whether a VSS is effective. Rather, they shape the empirical conditions under which effectiveness can be examined. Structural concentration limits the extent to which findings can be generalized across metals and regions. Cross-recognition introduces institutional layering, which complicates the attribution of observed changes to any single standard. Ownership heterogeneity, in turn, produces uneven informational visibility, affecting the availability, comparability, and consistency of performance data across facilities and jurisdictions. The case therefore demonstrates that, even when participation and assessment records are publicly accessible, institutional and informational constraints significantly influence the feasibility of evaluating behavioral or performance change. The RMI case does not provide a direct test of effectiveness; instead, it clarifies the structural conditions that must be accounted for when applying the proposed three-dimensional effectiveness framework.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2