302 equitable participatory spaces with other water users, thereby contributing to the sustainable management of water resources at the territorial level. Finally, the process of defining METRHI’s membership responds to existing gaps between regional and local governments, seeking to generate tangible shared value among the water users involved, while recognizing the Local Water Administration (ALA) as the local governing authority for the IWRM. Decisions adopted in relation to water resources must therefore be grounded in the specific physical and social characteristics of the territories under the ALA’s functional jurisdiction, as well as in the actual needs expressed by local stakeholders. 5.4. Operational Dynamics and Decision-Making The operational dynamics of METRHI are structured around regular plenary sessions convened by the Technical Secretariat, assumed by the Tambo Alto Tambo Local Water Administration (ALA), which acts as the facilitating and coordinating body. These sessions constitute the primary space for information exchange, collective analysis of water-related issues, and the identification of priority actions. The agenda of each session is defined based on the issues raised by members, the outcomes of previous meetings, and the technical needs identified through ongoing coordination with local actors. Decision-making within METRHI is based on consensus-building rather than formal voting procedures, reflecting its nature as a participatory and collaborative governance mechanism. Discussions are informed by technical inputs provided by the ALA and other institutions with sectoral competencies, as well as by experiential knowledge contributed by local users. This approach allows decisions to be grounded in both hydrological criteria and territorial realities, while fostering shared responsibility among participants. A key operational feature of METRHI is the articulation between technical information and participatory processes. Hydrological and hydrographic data, monitoring results, and regulatory information are presented and discussed collectively, enabling members to jointly interpret water-related challenges and assess potential interventions. This dynamic contributes to reducing information asymmetries among users and strengthens transparency in decision-making processes. The outcomes of METRHI sessions are formally recorded through meeting minutes, which serve as an accountability and follow-up mechanism. These records document agreements reached, responsibilities assigned, and timelines for action, providing continuity to the process and facilitating coordination with other institutional spaces within the SNGRH. While METRHI does not hold formal decision-making authorities over water allocations or permits, its operational value lies in its capacity to generate coordinated actions, align stakeholder expectations, and inform institutional responses led by the competent authorities. As an emerging governance mechanism, METRHI remains in an adaptive phase, with operational arrangements evolving in response to territorial dynamics, stakeholder participation, and external conditions. This flexibility has enabled the mechanism to respond to immediate water-related concerns while laying the groundwork for more structured governance arrangements in the future, including potential articulation with basin-level institutions.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2