dramatically through evolving legal rights, political realities, and rising global expectations around reconciliation, consent, and stewardship. Indigenous worldviews often approach sustainability not as a checklist of metrics, but as a holistic understanding of relationships — between people, communities, economies, and the natural world, across generations. A simple test cuts through all of it: ask who owns sustainability. If the answer is not everyone, the organization still has work to do. 3. GO SLOW TO GO FAST In a sector now under intense pressure to accelerate, understanding what speed actually depends upon becomes the critical question. The conventional model is the critical path: linear, sequential and time-driven. In that model, early relationship work can look like delay. Every week spent at the front end appears to be a week added to the schedule. But that model is incomplete. In project settings where communities, Indigenous nations and local regions carry the consequences of development, relationship work is not outside the critical path. It is part of it. Through practice, I have come to describe the alternative as ‘go slow to go fast’ — a term of art I use consistently across this body of work, and one that the graphic below gives visual truth to. It is not a counsel of delay. It is a different and more accurate understanding of project arithmetic. When early engagement is compressed, friction accumulates. It may begin with dust on a road, water concerns, employment expectations or distrust about information. If unaddressed, it becomes resistance, then conflict, then delay. Conversely, time invested early can change the shape of the project trajectory. Relationships are in place before they are tested. Information channels exist before they are needed. When difficult moments arise, there is something to hold. The front end of a project is not dead time if it prevents the back end from becoming crisis time. 157
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2