● Bolivia and Ecuador (hybrid mining territories) The modular design allows local recalibration while preserving the central concept: legitimacy competition as governance risk. 8. Conclusions and Implications for Industry This paper developed and operationalized the Territorial Legitimacy Risk Index (TLRI) as an early warning framework to identify territories where illegal mining may evolve into a governance competitor. The empirical results demonstrate that mining governance stress in Peru is highly concentrated rather than generalized. A limited number of regions accumulate the strongest combinations of territorial informality, illicit finance, institutional fragility, disruption capacity, and formal gold overlap. Three strategic conclusions emerge: 1. Territorial Presence Matters Illegal mining risk rises where informal actors accumulate durable territorial scale. 2. Economic Embeddedness Sustains Resilience Where illegal mining becomes economically central, suppression costs rise and social tolerance expands. 3. Governance Volatility Creates Opportunity Unstable or ambiguous regulatory frameworks can strengthen adaptive informal systems. Implications for Industry For mining companies and investors, illegal mining should not be viewed only as a compliance or security issue. It can affect: ● concession stability ● logistics and transport corridors ● social license conditions ● gold traceability systems ● ESG credibility ● long-term investment predictability Practical Uses of the TLRI The framework offers a scalable mechanism to: ● detect territorial stress early ● prioritize intervention resources ● strengthen concession risk management ● support ESG due diligence ● inform public-private coordination ● anticipate emerging hotspots before disruption escalates Final Strategic Message 42
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2