183 structurally the environment where vulnerable communities live and provision their food and goods. To contribute as an innovative solution in this context, looking forward not only to complying with best practices and standards, but also exploring an attractive business case for sustainable finance, the proposal is replicating a successful experience of the natural gas industry: a biodiversity management system, adding a social management component so that stakeholders value biodiversity and nature. This is a win-win-win solution (or w3solution) since we focus on: i) Nature and Biodiversity valuation in the financial equation of the company, put their care as a priority. The expectation is a reduction of the interest rate due to the possibility of getting Sustainability Linked Loans (SLL)2. ii) Local stakeholders (communities, leaders, governments and institutions) will understand the asset they already have and can be used in their benefit directly through sustainable credits and bonds. iii) Investors (board members, shareholders, workers of the company) will have potential co-investment that provides sustainable project life cycle and cost reduction. METHODOLOGY OR APPROACH Inspired by the TNFD methodology, the LEAP approach brings location, evaluation, assessment and planning. For including biodiversity and nature factors in the lifecycle of an extractive/mining project, we will consider the experience of Camisea Project, for an adaptation focused on sustainable investment. The adapted steps are: a) Locate the area of potential implementation and identify the KPIs associated with investor requests for natural approach b) Evaluate the materiality and benefits for the company, the environment and the local communities (w3) c) Assessment and engagement with locals (communities and authorities) d) Planning and monitoring of road map implementation. This is adaptive monitoring, to make investment decision based on real time data. Each step is designed to state and develop internal capabilities initially in the company, but also in the stakeholders of interest and potentially affected (positively or negatively) by the project. Monitoring includes (biodiversity) materiality analysis, which is divided into financial materiality and social materiality which consider KPI´s identified during the process. Materiality is particularly relevant for companies when using indicators that support the 2 The financial materiality of biodiversity is empirically supported by recent transactions, such as Anglo American’s $100M sustainability-linked loan (Anglo American, 2022), where interest rate margins are tied to Net Positive Impact goals, and by academic findings suggesting that SLLs offer a 7-10% cost-of-capital advantage over traditional loans (SSRN, 2023).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2