204 However, the dual-lens distribution reveals that this strength is primarily operational in nature. Across these clusters, explicit requirements are largely formulated through management systems, planning instruments, documentation obligations, and grievance mechanisms. By contrast, the articulation of clearly defined minimum social outcome thresholds remains more limited. This pattern suggests that the standard emphasizes institutionalization of processes over the codification of non-negotiable substantive guarantees. Labour and working conditions appear comparatively more balanced, suggesting partial integration of substantive protections beyond purely operational obligations. Occupational health and safety similarly demonstrate strong operational structuring, although the formalization of explicit outcome-based minimum conditions remains more limited. Indigenous peoples' rights show moderate alignment. Participation, consultation and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) are integrated into procedures, but the structural conditions under which consent is applied and the extent to which it constitutes a binding threshold are not specified as consistently. This reflects a model in which the participatory architecture is formalised, while the distributive and power-related dimensions are less explicitly codified. A clear structural gap emerges in artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM), where both overall coverage and normative articulation remain comparatively weak. This gap distinguishes ASM from other social domains and marks a boundary within the scope of social integration in the standard. Table 3: Social assessment under the dual-lens framework (IRMA Case) Criterion Operational strength Normative Alignment Structural interpretation Human rights abuses High Low Strong safeguards; limited threshold codification Labour & working conditions ModerateHigh Moderate Includes substantive worker protections Occupational health & safety High Moderate Robust systems; limited minimum outcome guarantees Community health & safety Moderate Low Risk-based approach; weak outcome thresholds Indigenous rights Moderate Low Formalized FPIC; limited binding thresholds Cultural heritage Very High Low Strong protection systems; limited outcome thresholds
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2