Track 7: Andean Flagship Sessions

5.3 Limitations Several limitations warrant consideration. The cross-sectional design captures a single temporal snapshot; longitudinal validation is required to confirm projected transition probabilities. The single-site focus limits generalizability, though it enables contextual depth consistent with the diagnostic-before-design methodology. The adaptive learning system remains at design stage—implementation outcomes are projected rather than observed. The 100% male workforce composition prevents gender-based analysis. The near-census coverage (84.5%, n=60 of 71), while methodologically advantageous for population-level description, means findings characterize this specific workforce rather than a sample from a broader population. 5.4 Transferability The diagnostic-before-design methodology demonstrates transferability potential to analogous contexts characterized by mature workforces facing technological modernization. The approach addresses Li et al.’s (2011) identified bottleneck in mineral processing—unsystematic knowledge transmission—by providing structured assessment prior to intervention. More broadly, the methodology contributes to Standing’s (1997) underdeveloped “skill reproduction security” pillar within just transition frameworks, as emphasized by De Ruyter and Bentley (2024). Rather than treating workforce preparation as a byproduct of technology implementation, this approach positions human factors integration at the design stage—precisely what Lund et al. (2024) identified as absent from Mining 4.0 practice. The specific instruments (productivity model, game theory analysis, adaptive item banks) require contextual calibration, but the sequential logic—diagnose cultural reality, identify coordination barriers, then design adaptive interventions targeting empirically-identified leverage points—is transferable to any industrial context where human and technological systems must co-evolve. 6. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that cultural diagnosis must precede adaptive learning design if workforce preparation for technological transitions is to succeed. The empirical findings from 60 fire refining workers at a Chilean state-owned copper company’s division reveal a workforce operating at 40.6% of productive potential—not because workers lack technical capability, but because motivational and organizational commitment deficits constrain performance multiplicatively. The diagnostic-before-design methodology transforms this insight into actionable architecture: differentiated learning pathways calibrated to four empirically-derived worker segments, supervisor-mediated interventions at critical junctures, and adaptive algorithms that respond to individual profiles rather than demographic assumptions. Three findings carry implications beyond this specific context. First, the null correlation between age and change resistance (ρ=–0.089, p=0.506) challenges the prevalent organizational practice of deprioritizing experienced workers during technological transitions—a practice that forfeits both human capital and the tacit operational knowledge most critical during periods of change. Second, supervisors explaining 15–20% of variance in change readiness establishes immediate supervisory relationships as the highest-leverage intervention point, exceeding all 226

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2