Who Pays For Justice? Legal Representation For Mining-Affected Communities – With A Focus On South Africa G. Wellmann gwendolyn@gwendolynwellmann.com Abstract Communities displaced by mining lack access to independent legal representation precisely when they need it most. International frameworks established detailed procedural expectations around consultation, disclosure and grievance, yet none unambiguously addresses the funding of independent legal counsel for affected communities. This paper examines that gap through the lens of South Africa’s 2022 Mine Community Resettlement Guidelines and the Dingleton resettlement case, drawing comparative lessons from Australia, Canada and Latin America. The central finding is that company-funded legal representation for community members creates structural conflicts of interest that undermine the very processes the frameworks seek to protect. Foregrounding access to justice as a pillar of sustainable mining, the paper advances four innovative, operationally feasible models for institutionalising independent legal funding and proposes complementary reforms to international standards, national legislation and investor due diligence. Without such reforms, the communities on whom responsible mining depends will continue to negotiate on unequal terms, generating reputational, operational and rights-based risks that the mineral transition can ill afford. Keywords Involuntary resettlement, access to justice, legal representation, human rights, social license INTRODUCTION: A CRITICAL JUSTICE GAP AT THE HEARTOF THE MINERALS TRANSITION The global energy transition has placed critical minerals at the centre of geopolitical and economic urgency. As demand for copper, lithium, cobalt and rare earth elements accelerates, mining operations are expanding into new frontiers and intensifying around existing deposits. The World Mining Congress 2026 theme, ‘Mining for the Future: Trust, Transformation, Technology’, is an explicit acknowledgment that trust between industry and society is neither guaranteed nor incidental. It must be built, deliberately and structurally. Involuntary resettlement, which involves the physical and economic displacement of communities to make way for mining, is one of the most consequential social interventions the industry undertakes. International frameworks, including the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 5 (PS5), the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Standard 5 (ESS5), and guidance from the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) recognise that resettlement, when unavoidable, must not leave affected persons worse off than before, and should restore or improve livelihood and standards of living. Yet a persistent and 108
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2